Andreas wrote: > If developers read about a database model in PalmOS, they > usually don't look it up in the American Heritage English > Dictionary but rather think of primary/secondary key fields, > indexes and all the other features of a standard RDBMS. Uh, that is Jim's point. Database != RDBMS. The term "database" is a fundamental concept, defined in a general way in a non-technical English dictionary. A RDBMS is a specialized example of a database. Palm is correct in their usage of the term database. Joseph Koral [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
- Re: Can a Palm database have more than one field per re... Tim Astle
- Re: Can a Palm database have more than one field per re... Richard Burmeister
- Re: Can a Palm database have more than one field per re... Lurenzel
- Re: Can a Palm database have more than one field per re... Glenn Bachmann
- Re: Can a Palm database have more than one field per re... Geoff Shepherd
- Re: Can a Palm database have more than one field per re... Lurenzel
- Re: Can a Palm database have more than one field per re... Lurenzel
- Can a Palm database have more than one field per record... Stringer
- Re: Can a Palm database have more than one field per re... Jim Schram
- Re: Can a Palm database have more than one field per re... Linke, Andreas
- Re: Can a Palm database have more than one field per re... Joseph Koral
- Re: Can a Palm database have more than one field per re... Lurenzel
- Re: Can a Palm database have more than one field per re... Steven Lawson
