We also have tech support headaches with our Symbols (since they
pack L-Ion batteries, and they have a kind of big, rounded
form factor), with people who already have the ordinary Palms. It
requires that they either alternate their serial ports and have
two cradles hooked up, or swap them every time they want to sync
one or the other (although we ask them to use different computers
whenever they can). The m100 should definitely be considered an
"entry level" product. I bet the IRSync would be darn useful (except
in Win2k) in a case where you have a m100 and a Palm V, and they
can't share a cradle...
-Rus
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Richard Hartman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 1:48 PM
>To: Palm Developer Forum
>Subject: Re: New products from Palm, Inc.
>
>
>
>Steve Sabram wrote in message <20048@palm-dev-forum>...
>>
>>I like the new look of the
>>m100. It bottom curve is a very non-threatening form that a lot of
>consumer items have taken recently. It is very egg like in look
>>and handling. Also, all those curves doesn't' have any
>corners to press
>against your chest when the device is worn inside a shirt
>>pocket. I wouldn't be surprised if that was a factor in the
>mold design.
>
>
>You forgot the most important thing about the bottom curve ...
>it requires
>yet another new mating formfactor for devices like modems & cradles...
>
>--
>-Richard M. Hartman
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to
>unsubscribe, please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
>
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see
http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
