in article 40408@palm-dev-forum, Danny Epstein at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/2/01 9:02 AM: > Did you use > DmQueryRecord, DmGetRecord, or DmNewRecord? The first sets doesn't set the > busy bit; the second and third do. You're only supposed to call > DmReleaseRecord to clear the busy bit if you previously called DmGetRecord > or DmNewRecord to set the busy bit. Yes, it was a DmQueryRecord. This was to determine the current (internal) size to see if the DmResizeRecord was required. I'll take the DmReleaseRecord out ... but don't I still need somehow to set the dirty bit? Stephen Best Bitware Australia -- For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
- Re: OS 4.0dr4 - DataMgr.c, Line:6915, Record isn't busy John Marshall
- Re: OS 4.0dr4 - DataMgr.c, Line:6915, Record isn't busy John Marshall
- Re: OS 4.0dr4 - DataMgr.c, Line:6915, Record isn't busy Danny Epstein
- Re: OS 4.0dr4 - DataMgr.c, Line:6915, Record isn't busy Stephen Best
- Re: OS 4.0dr4 - DataMgr.c, Line:6915, Record isn't busy Danny Epstein
- Re: OS 4.0dr4 - DataMgr.c, Line:6915, Record isn't busy Stephen Best
- Re: OS 4.0dr4 - DataMgr.c, Line:6915, Record isn't busy Danny Epstein
- OS 4.0dr4 - DataMgr.c, Line:6915, Record isn't busy Stephen Best
- Re: OS 4.0dr4 - DataMgr.c, Line:6915, Record isn't busy Stephen Best
- Re: OS 4.0dr4 - DataMgr.c, Line:6915, Record isn't busy Philip Sheard
- Re: OS 4.0dr4 - DataMgr.c, Line:6915, Record isn't busy Danny Epstein
- Re: OS 4.0dr4 - DataMgr.c, Line:6915, Record isn't busy Philip Sheard
