Aaron,
That is what I figured. I just wanted to make sure
that I didn't use an enumeration that did not exist in
an old OS version. I pretty much figured out which OS
version support which battery kind enumerations.
Thanks all for your help.
Mike McCollister
--- Aaron Ardiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for the information on which way to assume.
>
> keep in mind that palmos is backward compatible..
> using 3.5 headers
> will allow you to compile an app for 1.0 :) just
> as long as you dont
> use API's that didn't exist then.
>
> the same would apply for the enumerated types..
> they normally
> "add" new ones :) so, on a 3.0 device, the
> constants declared in
> 3.5 headers would never occur (the new ones)
>
> // az
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.ardiri.com/ <--- free games!
>
>
> --
> For information on using the Palm Developer Forums,
> or to unsubscribe, please see
http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see
http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
