Would it help thinking that the memory moved away and the remaining area was
filled with garbage?
(Any one could guess how the garbage looks like ;-) )
But I get the point: every C programmer tends to use memcopy and not
memmove. Why PalmOS guys decided mount MemMove on the ROM and not MemCopy?
Some people on this ng have a story to tell.
Best Regards
Alberto Gaona
-----Mensaje original-----
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Igor
Mozolevsky
Enviado el: Viernes, 13 de Julio de 2001 06:30 p.m.
Para: Palm Developer Forum
Asunto: RE: MemCopy
--On 13 July 2001 17:25 -0700 Robert McKenzie
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That would be because MemMove does the same thing.
No it doesn't:-
"Purpose Move a rangle of memory to another range in dynamic heap"
I need to copy not move...
IM :-)
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe,
please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see
http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
