--On 13 July 2001 21:34 -0700 Dave Carrigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Igor Mozolevsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I just thought that MemMove did what the SDK reference said, instead of
>> what real memmove does... Maybe it's time for Palm to 'modify' the
>> reference to reflect the actual meaning...
>
> Real memmove doesn't actually move memory either.
Did I say that??? :-/ Read what I said!..
> Why would a function
> *move* memory; from an implementation perspective, it would be less
> efficient than copying it. I can't conceive of any possible gain to be
> had by moving memory; what would the system leave behind in the old
> location?
However, that is EXACTLY what the SDK reference implied... If you read it,
you'll see for your self...
IM
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see
http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
