> From: Paul Nevai
>
> I know that currently SysTicksPerSecond () == 60 on POSE
> and 100 otherwise.
Bad assumption, Paul. Just now with Pose 3.1 on my Win2K machine,
SysTicksPerSecond == 100.
> My question is, if there are any plans to have any Palms
> where it is NOT 100.
I don't know anything about the plans of Palm, Inc. and its licensees.
> Any predictions? Thanks. Paul N.
Since the OS provides the documented SysTicksPerSecond() function and the
docs say, "This routine allows applications to be tolerant of changes to the
ticks per second rate in the system," I predict that change is likely.
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see
http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
