> Only to people who have the binary, I think. I'm certainly no expert on the > subject. But the whole point of the GPL is to allow people using a program > to modify that program. There's nothing that says that the source is freely > distributable. > > #include <JohnMarshallCorrections.h>
(since JohnMarshallCorrections.h also sometimes are included in ChristianCorrections.h, I'll include a few comments here) <URL: http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html> Paragraph 4 of the Preamble: "For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether gratis or for a fee, you must give the recipients all the rights that you have. You must make sure that they, too, receive or can get the source code. And you must show them these terms so they know their rights." This means that the source _is_ freely distributable, and that it's illegal not to make them available. The whole point is that its illegal to distribute the binaries and not the sources. The GPL says a whole lot about the topic, for example its not allowed only to make the sources available on request, or by patches (diffs) etc. -- Christian http://www.falch.net/ -- For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/tech/support/forums/
