On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 07:51:33AM -0700, Joe Siebenmann wrote:
> I later discovered that, after I changed back to using
> pilrc 2.8, that it was "back to normal".
>
> Pilrc 2.9 has since been updated.
So you've verified that the problem is fixed in "current PilRC 2.9"
(2.9p2? 2.9p5?) now? Or should the maintainers still check to make
sure that there isn't a regression compared to PilRC 2.8 or so?
Great, thanks for the update.
John
--
For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see
http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/
