On Tue, 28 May 2002, John Marshall wrote: > > I later discovered that, after I changed back to using > > pilrc 2.8, that it was "back to normal". > > > > Pilrc 2.9 has since been updated. > > So you've verified that the problem is fixed in "current PilRC 2.9" > (2.9p2? 2.9p5?) now? Or should the maintainers still check to make > sure that there isn't a regression compared to PilRC 2.8 or so? > > Great, thanks for the update.
i'd like to know what the bug was :) it seems that it has weeded its way out.. but, still.. would be nice to know where it was broken :) // az [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ardiri.com/ -- For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/
