On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, r. zane rutledge wrote: > Why must the "DENSITY 2" flag only apply to members of a "family"? Why > not just add a density flag to any BITMAP or BITMAPCOLOR or anything > else? Why can you "not have only bmp with DENSITY 2 in BitmapFamilyEx."? > (As far as I can tell, this isn't a limitation inherent in new bitmaps. > Why couldn't you have a resource that was ONLY a double-density bitmap?)
just create a family, with only one bitmap inside it :) same thing. the BITMAP, BITMAPGREY etc are just convenience tags.. BITMAP ID 1000 "mybitmap.bmp" is the same as: BITMAPFAMILY ID 1000 "mybitmap.bmp" BITMAPGREY ID 1000 "mybitmap.bmp" is the same as: BITMAPFAMILY ID 1000 "" "mybitmap.bmp" see the pattern? :) > I see this as a limitation. It might simply be an early pass at revising > pilrc, but I for one could really use the ability to make a double-density > resource as a standalone. you know what a pain in the a** it was to get hi-density into pilrc? ;P // az [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ardiri.com/ -- For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/
