"Hildinger, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > "Gregg Woodcock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > This must be a compiler bug. A "Char" is typedef'd to be equivalent to a > "char" in PalmTypes.h, so naturally you would expect there to be no > difference in the code. I compiled your code using CW9.2 and not > surprisingly it produced code that was exactly equivalent on a binary level.
Is there a way to test from what file the type definition for "Char" is being resolved? Perhaps I am picking up some other typedef? > Have you tried looking at the disassembly of the two individual functions to > see what the compiler thingks is going on? I'm sure that will reveal some > discrepancy between the two pieces of code. No, but I'd rather avoid that unless this turns out to be "just me"... > BTW: Is this the same Gregg Woodcock who works for Nortel? One and the same! -- For information on using the Palm Developer Forums, or to unsubscribe, please see http://www.palmos.com/dev/support/forums/
