Ciaran McCreesh (2007-11-23 16:22): > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 10:17:52 -0500 > Richard Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And that is after running it about three times so everything is in > > cache - the first time took about 40 seconds. > > > > Don't get me wrong - inquisitio is a great tool but it isn't quite a > > replacement for eix yet. If there is some caching feature I can use > > to speed it up please do point it out. > > Yes, but there's no need for it to be instant. The only time you'd use > inquisitio is if you're searching for something, in which case it'll > take you longer than a minute to read the output anyway, so a small > amount of latency is irrelevant. > > If you want wrong answers very very quickly, cat /dev/urandom instead. > > > In any case, I'd think that just about everybody on this list isn't > > afraid from deviating from the "official" way of doing things - why > > else would they be using paludis in the first place? :) > > Mmm, I was thinking people would be using Paludis because they want > correctness... > > -- > Ciaran McCreesh
...and I thought I was using paludis because it was faster for me (and I like the --show-reasons)... > _______________________________________________ > paludis-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.pioto.org/mailman/listinfo/paludis-user -- Algardas _______________________________________________ paludis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pioto.org/mailman/listinfo/paludis-user
