On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 10:17:52 -0500 Richard Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And that is after running it about three times so everything is in > cache - the first time took about 40 seconds. > > Don't get me wrong - inquisitio is a great tool but it isn't quite a > replacement for eix yet. If there is some caching feature I can use > to speed it up please do point it out.
Yes, but there's no need for it to be instant. The only time you'd use inquisitio is if you're searching for something, in which case it'll take you longer than a minute to read the output anyway, so a small amount of latency is irrelevant. If you want wrong answers very very quickly, cat /dev/urandom instead. > In any case, I'd think that just about everybody on this list isn't > afraid from deviating from the "official" way of doing things - why > else would they be using paludis in the first place? :) Mmm, I was thinking people would be using Paludis because they want correctness... -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ paludis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pioto.org/mailman/listinfo/paludis-user
