On Sat, 24 May 2008 18:08:53 +0200 Luis Fernando Muñoz Mejías <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, you're imposing to users to use a single network filesystem that > gets as both performance bottleneck and failure point.
Uh, no. That's another non-scalable way of doing it. > Binary packages (quickpkg, RPM, whatever) is just an intermediate step > for large-scale package management. A step that Paludis can provide > (if devs want to, of course). Uh huh. > The remaining steps are outside Paludis scope. No, they're really not. There's nothing stopping us from solving the problem properly when we want to. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ paludis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pioto.org/mailman/listinfo/paludis-user
