I would like to help, but I don't have the time or cross-compiling know-how to do so.
On Monday 13 October 2008 11:28:53 am Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > contrarius depends rather heavily upon some nastily hacked Gentoo > ebuilds that aren't well tested, that are very configuration sensitive > and that get broken on a regular basis. Even when it does work it's > largely pointless because ebuilds don't support cross compiling. My experience with contrarius was for setting up a cross-compiler for distcc. > > If we can't get someone to pick contrarius up, I'm seriously considering > dropping it in 0.32. The portage way for setting up cross-compilers is sys-dev/crossdev, which is a big bash script hard-coded for use with portage. If contrarius is dropped, do you anticipate any problems if crossdev is used alongside paludis? The only problem I would expect may be maintaining paludis config files and neglecting some of the portage configs that would be relevent. _______________________________________________ paludis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pioto.org/mailman/listinfo/paludis-user
