Am Montag 13 Oktober 2008 18:28:53 schrieb ext Ciaran McCreesh: > If we can't get someone to pick contrarius up, I'm seriously considering > dropping it in 0.32.
Wouldn't it anyway be better to make the packaging system cross-compile safe
and add the logic for creating the crosscompiler into the toolchain
ebuilds/eclass (or exheres)? Would make it easier IMHO to adapt to special
requirements for different cross-compilers.
In the end, the user would install sys-devel/i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc or sys-
devel/sparc-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc instead of just sys-devel/gcc and -
depending on host architecture - should get a native or a cross-compiler.
Each of them could also support its own set of USE flags (or options).
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408
Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 111
Capgemini Deutschland | Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wanheimerstraße 68 | Web: http://www.capgemini.com
D-40468 Düsseldorf | ICQ#: 110037733
GPG Public Key C2E467BB | Keyserver: wwwkeys.pgp.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ paludis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pioto.org/mailman/listinfo/paludis-user
