It would be a problem but every Qt version is one big package, so there's not any reason for that (few modules new and others older) to happen.
But it's safer to check it first, if you don't want to end up with a non- working Qt for a while, I guess... K. Larsen wrote: > Thanks for the explanation David. There is, however one possible > problem that I can see with this method. What happens when one qt > library gets updated before the others? Or you happen to do a sync > before all the qt libraries have been updated on the mirrors? Then, > by discarding the blocks, you'll end up with one library that's newer > than the others. And, as you said, this could lead to problems. > > There needs to be a solution that will only upgrade the QT libraries > if they will all be upgraded to the same version. > > Thanks for the help, though. I did get it working. :) > > -Kameron > _______________________________________________ > paludis-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.pioto.org/mailman/listinfo/paludis-user > _______________________________________________ paludis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pioto.org/mailman/listinfo/paludis-user
