On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 15:01:46 -0400 "Tom" <[email protected]> wrote: > To cover all bases, should "--no-complete" and "--no-everything" also > be put at the beginning of CAVE_RESOLVE_OPTIONS? That would guarantee > that only one of "-z", "-c", or "-e" would be passed to "cave > resolve". In this case, CAVE_RESOLVE_OPTIONS would be: > > "--no-lazy --no-complete --no-everything --complete" > > Or, since "--complete overrides the previous --no-complete": > > "--no-lazy --no-everything --complete"
To cover all bases, cave should be smart enough to ignore complete / everything / lazy if it's in an _OPTIONS and if something else is specified not in _OPTIONS. Or maybe we shouldn't be paying attention to CAVE_RESOLVE_OPTIONS at all for fix-linkage... -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ paludis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pioto.org/mailman/listinfo/paludis-user
