On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:57:57 +1000 Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8 September 2010 05:09, Ciaran McCreesh > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Or maybe we shouldn't be paying attention to CAVE_RESOLVE_OPTIONS at > > all for fix-linkage... > > What about options like --resume-file ?
That's probably the exception... > Actually, would it be possible to have an overall CAVE_OPTIONS that's > used for "common" (in the sense that if it applies to a sub-command > then it uses it otherwise it ignores it) options like this, to avoid > having to specify it for resolve, resume, etc.? There is a CAVE_OPTIONS, but you can only put in it options that are valid for every single subcommand. Ignoring unrecognised things is a bit iffy... What if someone sticks something like '-a' in there, which does lots of different things for different subcommands? -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ paludis-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.pioto.org/mailman/listinfo/paludis-user
