Hello, Thank you. I'm working on one now that fits that description. I started out in plastic and just started paper a few years ago. There are many reviews of plastic models that pull no punches. NO, they do not villify but cover the good the bad and the part(s) that plane just do not work.
This is a very polite and considerate site but when you spend hours just trying to figure out what is ment, looking at poor instructions, and thinking I will never build again I think it is o.k. to politely let others know your frustrations and give them a heads up before they try a model, On Feb 8, 1:14 pm, Mike Hungerford <[email protected]> wrote: > ... will I even consider attempting to build a paper model whose > designer has not provided photographic evidence of having successfully > built one himself. I know I'm guilty of this omission myself, but at > least I get someone to beta build for me and assure me that everything > works, including the instructions. > > I have attempted builds of at least six models from one particular > designer (who shall remain nameless) of mostly SF models, and have > only ever managed to complete one of those with the result actually > resembling the original subject, and that after several reprints and > much cutting and replacing of already-installed parts and assemblies. > > My current attempt to build one of his models will probably require a > complete redraw to make parts fit one another. > > (Disengaging rant mode) > -- > Mike Hungerfordhttp://www.chthulhu.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Papermodels II" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/papermodels?hl=en.
