On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:22:40AM -0800, Edward S. Peschko wrote: > > Patching Module::ScanDeps to optionally yield extra results via > > Module::Info sounds okay. Otherwise, patching pp to use the App::Packer > > interface is another way to go. > > Do you control Module::ScanDeps?
Why, yes I do. > I looked through Module::Info, and that requires B::Utils. In > addition, Module::Info has the following limitations: > > 1) uses optree to find information, not runtime info > 2) can't find modules inside an eval > 3) code refs in @INC are currently ignored. Ah. Ho hum. I see. Well, then I'd welcome you to subclass Module::ScanDeps, into Module::ScanDeps::Runtime, and follow then same interface. Alternatively, you may try to hack the functionality into Module::ScanDeps itself, and see if it can be done in a relatively clean fashion. Thanks, /Autrijus/
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
