On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 12:38:23PM -0600, Joshua b. Jore wrote: > That's interesting and probably not the best use of B::Deobfuscate. I'd just > finished writing B::Source and was going to use it to include Pod, comments > and the original 'obfuscated' source code along-side the deparse output. > > I had a B::Obfuscate once which produced Stunnix-like output but never > published it. I suppose I could publish it anyway. It'd make a nicer backend > for this purpose than something intended for deobfuscation since that's > likely to get even friendlier over time.
It would nicely complement B::Deobfuscate. :-) (And further remind people this sort of obfuscation is not as tough to circumvent as others might hope you assume. Worth every penny you paid for it...) Nicholas Clark
