On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 11:07:28AM -0800, Glenn Linderman wrote: > So on Win32 (and maybe eventually also on Unix if relocatable perls > become the norm there, and Nicholas's recent comments on p5p seem to > indicate that will soon become the case), a stripped parl will not work, > per the above explanation.
I think people are reading into what I said. They are do-able. (I didn't qualify it further - it's only reliable on (to my knowledge) Linux, Solaris, and *BSD with /proc mounted so that you can get the full path of the perl executable if it's been invoked via a relative path) I participated as little as possible in that perl5-porters thread given that it seemed to be far more heat than light, and the fastest way to kill it is to let it burn out. Nicholas Clark
