Hi! I've been trying to add some documentation to stress the similarity (and hopefully differences) of '-f' and '-F': my first attempt was to add plains S<(c.f. -F, --modfilter)> and S<(c.f. -f, --filter)> but then I thought that I might as well use an hyperlink, but... the most obvious L<S<(c.f. B<-F>, B<--modfilter>)>|/B<-F>, B<--modfilter>=I<FILTER>> and L<S<(c.f. B<-f>, B<--filter>)>|/B<-f>, B<--filter>=I<FILTER>> don't really work: 'podchecker' doesn't complain, but 'pod2html' fails to give valid references (I mean it doesn't recognise what I'm trying to point to), the problem is the formating in the item header; it somehow confuses 'pod2html'.
I see several options: - get a suggestion on that (I've searched a lot, but couldn't find anything very useful). - drop this idea of having a link (...). - write it off as a bug in 'pod2html' (I've read some not so positive comments on it), and hope that the issue will solve itself. - reorganise the documentation not to have formating in the items text (I don't think it's a good idea!). - ? Thanks! Philippe Steffen Mueller wrote: > > Philippe Schaffnit schrieb: > > Right! Thanks a lot for your quick reply: my mistake indeed! > > No problem. Happens to everybody. > > > I had overseen the difference between '--filter' and '--modfilter'... > > (maybe a comment in the help: see the other one for each, could be > > helpful, but anyone there's no substitue for *carefully* RTFM...) > > You're right. Unless I am mistaken, you have commit access to the > repository. Just add a short mention of the other switch if you like. > > > PS: I'm sorry I missed the post you're mentioning, BTW, I don't seem to > > be able to get on the list archive right now (something local?). > > No idea. > > > PPS: Yes, I had followed the dissusion which followed your introduction > > of Squish, and I was only expecting a small nudge: I am experiencing > > some difficulties packing a Perl::Tk script, and I am under the > > impression that from some critical amount of code on, Tk starts > > mis-behaving, which is what I was trying to look into... > > Can't help you there. I successfully packaged a ~80k lines Tk > application consisting of 35k lines of my code + CPAN modules. But it > wasn't exactly pretty. (Lots of -M's and lots of "require Tk::FOO::BAR;" > in the script to make pp happy) > > Good luck! > > Steffen
