On 12/19/06, Philip Gwyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But I gave up on that route, and tried to find out why LD_LIBRARY_PATH was
failing. Groveling through strace output, which I should have done back then.
The problem was that I was using the --tempcache param to pp (I submitted a
patch for this a while back. I don't think it was accepted) which allows me to
control what the cache directory is called (the hash part, not the PAR_TMPDIR
part). And the directory name I was using contained ':' $(shell date
+"%Y%m%d-%T") and the : was being used as a list seperator. Change the %T to
%h%M%S and everything works perfectly.
So, this is a bug/misfeature of ldd, not PAR.
Thanks for following up on this one - I too was still wondering about
the unexpected
LD_LIBRARY_PATH behaviour...
Cheers, Roderich
