> From: Jan Dubois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 8:31 PM
> To: KONOVALOV, Vadim (Vadim)** CTR **; 'Mark Dootson'; 'Yuval Levy'
> Cc: 'Steffen Mueller'; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: PAR::Packer 0.980 MSWin32 .par binary?
> 
> On Wed, 14 May 2008, KONOVALOV, Vadim (Vadim)** CTR ** wrote:
> > 
> > and yet please do not forget that it is clearly stated 
> somewhere that it
> > is against license agreement to distribute MSVCR90.dll, so it is not
> > possible from Licenses POW also!
> 
> I doubt this could be true, as it would make the compiler 
> quite useless
> if you couldn't run the generated applications on a machine 
> without the
> compiler.  This document seems to explicitly allow deploying 
> MSVCR90.dll
> in an application specific directory together with the rest 
> of your application:
> 
>     http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms235299.aspx

I am not a lawyer and I could read incorrectly but this is what I saw in
win32/INSTALL file of clisp at
http://clisp.cvs.sourceforge.net/clisp/clisp/win32msvc/INSTALL?revision=
1.21&view=markup:

Installation on Win32 (WinNT, Win95) using the MSVC4.0 or MSVC5.0 or
MSVC6.0
========================================================================
====
or MSVC7.0 development environment, using native system calls
=============================================================

** Note! Binaries created with MSVC 7.0 with MFLAGS=-MD should not be
   distributed: They depend on a closed-source library 'msvcr70.dll'
which is
   not normally part of a Woe32 installation. You cannot distribute
   'msvcr70.dll' with the binaries - this would be a violation of the
GPL and
   of the Microsoft EULA. You can distribute the binaries without
including
   'msvcr70.dll', but this will cause problems for users that don't have
this
   library on their system. Therefore it is not recommended. This
problem does
   not occur with MSVC 6.0 and earlier.


May be 90 is different, and may be I got expression from wrong source

However another big problem is size of these DLLs 

> 
> What is NOT allowed is to install the library into 
> "$ENV{SYSTEMROOT}\\system32",
> but that is a bad idea anyways.
> 
> But as I wrote originally, it is best if you don't need any additional
> runtime library at all, which is the case for VC6 and MinGW.

yes, very true

Best regards,
Vadim.

Reply via email to