Hi,

-- Steffen Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

For the case where you use Getopt::Euclid from a script, you'd have to
replace $0 with something... (The code is just a few lines down from
your change.)

ah yes, I forgot this ;-) -- but should include it in the final patch.

What is the reason, that the files are written with some other name (looks like a shortened checksum)?

I think it would be good if this can switched on and off.


changing Getopt::Euclid is for me not a big problem.
It has a lot of bugs and I fixed some of them locally; it seems, that
Damian Conway redirects bug reports and patches to /dev/null, but when

This is an entirely different problem. If you're prepared to maintain
the module, you could ask Damian for co-maintenance permissions on
PAUSE.

I am not sure if I want do this ;-) -- the code looks very complex, violating the "don't be clever" rule ...


Ciao
 Alvar


--
** Alvar C.H. Freude, http://alvar.a-blast.org/
** http://www.assoziations-blaster.de/
** http://www.wen-waehlen.de/
** http://odem.org/

Attachment: pgpl8zsCSNjTZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to