Fri Feb 18 08:51:31 2011: Request 65855 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by cow...@erudyn.com
Queue: Module-ScanDeps
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #65855] Special handling for POSIX requested
Broken in: 0.90, 0.91, 0.92, 0.93, 0.94, 0.95, 0.96, 0.97, 0.98
Severity: Normal
Owner: RSCHUPP
Requestors: cz...@cpan.org
Status: open
Ticket <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=65855 >
On 2/18/11 3:26 AM, Roderich Schupp via RT wrote:
> <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=65855>
>
> On 2011-02-17 16:59:43, CZBSD wrote:
>> I'd like to vote that the patch from this posting be adopted:
>>
>> http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.par/2009/06/msg4084.html
>>
>>
>> This is a tiny tweak that helps when using the POSIX with PAR.
> Sorry, that patch apparently fell through the cracks.
> But I don't like the proposed patch anymore.
>
> What is your actual problem? Still the POSIX::SigAction problem?
>
> Cheers, Roderich
Yes, precisely. Currently I have to manually apply the patch whenever
setting up a new development system.
Do you have a different approach in mind?
Thank you,
Charles
--
==== Charles Owens === charles.ow...@erudyn.com ====
