On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:18, Konovalov, Vadim (Vadim)** CTR ** <vadim.konova...@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > I am not fully agree here. > > PAR is well recognized technique, and if you have a fix to CPAN module > that allows PAR usage to the said module, the chances to get the module > updated are high.
As the current PAR maintainer I beg to differ: PAR is a gross hack. > fortunately you've found root of a problem, you need to nail down > the exact module in a problem. > Is it Pango CPAN module? At least Pango and Gtk2. >> This dual DLL loading - due to some Perl module misinterprets whether > XXX.dll already loaded - should be fixed. "Perl" doesn't misinterpret anything here. Do you understand how DynaLoader and DLL loading on the OS level works? > IOW - how exactly it computed that "Cairo.dll" is already loaded? I don't know - it's an educated guess. I'm not too familiar with the internals how Windows loads DLLs. Feel free to use something like sysinternals (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb842062) to explore what's really going on. Cheers, Roderich