Wed Mar 11 10:04:16 2015: Request 102689 was acted upon.
Transaction: Correspondence added by dzagas...@gmail.com
Queue: PAR-Packer
Subject: Re: [rt.cpan.org #102689] Module::ScanDeps isn't effective
Broken in: (no value)
Severity: Wishlist
Owner: Nobody
Requestors: z...@cpan.org
Status: rejected
Ticket <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=102689 >
Also option to add all packages under some namespace will be very useful
(like in perlapp).
For example: -M AnyEvent::*
This will allow to not to enumerate lot of packages in command line.
On 11.03.2015 15:36, Roderich Schupp via RT wrote:
> <URL: https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=102689 >
>
> Am 2015-03-11 09:05:28, ZDM schrieb:
>> Module::ScanDeps isn't effective.
> You probably meant: efficient.
>
>> Perl::LibExtractor produce much less deps tree.
>>
>> It use different algorithm - "use package" in separate process and
>> parse %INC after - so only really used packages are found.
>>
>> Also it works much more faster.
> ... but it doesn't catch all dependencies either.
>
> Not that the above approach is also used by Module::ScanDeps if use
> the --compile or --execute option. But the results only ADD dependencies
> to the ones found during static analysis.
>
>> It will be useful to add possibility to use Perl::LibExtractor with pp
>> or use similar approach to build deps tree.
> Code please - if you want to contribute some, add it to a wishlist bug for
> PAR::Packer.
>
> Cheers, Roderich
>
>
>
