I have not tried a newer version yet, but I will. This version (20161222) is what comes with Debian buster (https://packages.debian.org/buster/parallel). I suppose I was just assuming that Debian had the most up-to-date version of parallel (or at least close enough).
Obviously I was wrong after examining https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/parallel/ ~ Evan ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Friday, May 29, 2020 5:02 PM, Hubert Kowalski <h.kowal...@hakger.pl> wrote: > your version number is ANCIENT. have you tried with newesr and see if bug's > still there? >> Dnia 29 maj 2020 o 19:55 edowni...@protonmail.com napisał(a): > > > Hello, > >> > I've discovered a potential bug with parallel. > > Details: > * The >> version number: 20161222 > > * The bugid: Less than 1 byte free > > * The >> command line being run: $ time parallel --memfree 50G --retries 10 -a >> commands.txt 2> parallel_stderr.txt > parallel_stdout.txt > > * The specific >> commands in "commands.txt" are calls to a Python 3 script which uses the >> SHAP library to explain Keras deep learning models. >> https://github.com/slundberg/shap > > * The files being read (put the files >> on a webserver if they are big) > > * Unfortunately I cannot release the >> data files or code as they're for a private project I'm working on. If >> need-be, I can try to replicate this error using SHAP on an open dataset >> using a toy Python 3 script I can release. > > Please let me know what you >> think. > > Cheers, > Evan >
