Hmm. I am not seeing anything in there that is different from my setup
besides the Qt version. I have tried both 4.6.3 and 4.7.2 of Qt and
CMake versions 2.8.3 and 2.8.4. All with the same issue. Maybe asking
on the Qt interest list if anyone has ever seen this type of behavior
before?
_________________________________________________________
Mike Jackson                  [email protected]


On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 8:14 AM, David Partyka
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Qt 4.6.3 built by hand with cocoa, the binary is x64 only targeting 10.5. I
> am building from the tip of the 'release' branch.
> Qt Configure command:
> export QMAKE_MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.5
> ./configure
> --prefix=/Users/partyd/Dashboards/Support/qt-4.6.3-MacOSX10.5/bin -nomake
> demos -nomake examples -arch x86_64 -opensource -release -cocoa -shared
>
> I also pass these in as -D arguments on initial configure with cmake.
> set(CMAKE_OSX_ARCHITECTURES "x86_64" CACHE STRING "force build for 64-bit
> Leopard" FORCE)
> set(CMAKE_OSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET "10.5" CACHE STRING "force build for 64-bit
> Leopard" FORCE)
> set(CMAKE_OSX_SYSROOT "/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.5.sdk" CACHE PATH "force
> build for 64-bit Leopard" FORCE)
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Michael Jackson
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Dave,
>>  What is the configuration you are using? Qt Version? As Carbon or Cocoa?
>> Universal Binaries or x64 only? Self build or download from Nokia?
>>
>>  What tag from paraview git repository are you using? I may be able to get
>> my environment going like yours.
>>
>>  I also tried the latest ParaView master from head and my plugins need to
>> be updated for that to work so using that is out of the question at this
>> point.
>>
>>  This is what I have tried and have not worked:
>>    Qt 4.6.2 Self built with NO custom plugins
>>    Qt 4.7.2 Self built with NO custom plugins
>>    "make install" of both of the above.
>>    using sudo for everything to avoid possible permissions issues.
>>
>> I'll download the prebuilt Qt libraries from Nokia and try those. I guess
>> I could also try CMake 2.8.4
>> ___________________________________________________________
>> Mike Jackson                      www.bluequartz.net
>> Principal Software Engineer       [email protected]
>> BlueQuartz Software               Dayton, Ohio
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 23, 2011, at 6:33 PM, David Partyka wrote:
>>
>> > Can you provide the initial cmake configuration details of your vanila
>> > paraview build?
>> >
>> > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Michael Jackson
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > I tried this also:
>> >
>> > 562:[mjackson@ferb2:4.6.2]$ sudo rm -rf _CPack_Packages/; sudo cpack -G
>> > ZIP --config Applications/ParaView/CPackParaViewConfig.cmake
>> > CPack: Create package using ZIP
>> > CPack: Install projects
>> > CPack: - Run preinstall target for: ParaView Runtime Libs
>> > CPack: - Install project: ParaView Runtime Libs
>> > CPack: - Run preinstall target for: HDF5 Core Library
>> > CPack: - Install project: HDF5 Core Library
>> > CPack: - Run preinstall target for: VTK Runtime Libs
>> > CPack: - Install project: VTK Runtime Libs
>> > CPack: - Run preinstall target for: ParaView Components
>> > CPack: - Install project: ParaView Components
>> > CPack: Create package
>> > CPack Error: Problem while adding file<
>> > /Users/Shared/OpenSource/ParaView-3.10.1/4.6.2/_CPack_Packages/Darwin-i386/ZIP/ParaView-3.10.1-Darwin-i386/lib/paraview-3.10/libCosmo.dylib>
>> > to archive
>> > </Users/Shared/OpenSource/ParaView-3.10.1/4.6.2/_CPack_Packages/Darwin-i386/ZIP/ParaView-3.10.1-Darwin-i386.zip>
>> > .ERROR =archive_write_header: Filetype not supported
>> > CPack Error: Problem compressing the directory
>> > CPack Error: Error when generating package: ParaView
>> >
>> >
>> > And that was built against Qt 4.6.2.
>> > ___________________________________________________________
>> > Mike Jackson                      www.bluequartz.net
>> > Principal Software Engineer       [email protected]
>> > BlueQuartz Software               Dayton, Ohio
>> >
>> > On May 23, 2011, at 5:56 PM, David Partyka wrote:
>> >
>> > > I am really unsure, I haven't ever seen these kinds of errors before
>> > > and I am unable to reproduce this. sla.r on my system appears to just
>> > > contain license information. Have you tried manually removeing the
>> > > _CPack_Packages directory in your build tree to see if for some reason 
>> > > cpack
>> > > isn't able to blow it away entirely?
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Michael Jackson
>> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > When running CPack on a "clean" paraview build directory where NONE of
>> > > my plugins are being build I get the following after trying to run CPack:
>> > >
>> > > cpack -G DragNDrop --config
>> > > Applications/ParaView/CPackParaViewConfig.cmake
>> > > .....
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > /Users/Shared/OpenSource/ParaView-3.10.1/Build/_CPack_Packages/Darwin-i386/DragNDrop/sla.r:522:
>> > > ### /usr/bin/Rez - String spans lines.
>> > >
>> > > /Users/Shared/OpenSource/ParaView-3.10.1/Build/_CPack_Packages/Darwin-i386/DragNDrop/sla.r:
>> > > ### /usr/bin/Rez - Since errors occurred,
>> > > /Users/Shared/OpenSource/ParaView-3.10.1/Build/_CPack_Packages/Darwin-i386/DragNDrop/temp-udco.dmg's
>> > > resource fork was not completely updated.
>> > >
>> > > /Users/Shared/OpenSource/ParaView-3.10.1/Build/_CPack_Packages/Darwin-i386/DragNDrop/sla.r:
>> > > ### /usr/bin/Rez - SysError -37 during set file info.
>> > >
>> > > CPack Error: Problem compressing the directory
>> > > CPack Error: Error when generating package: ParaView
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ___________________________________________________________
>> > > Mike Jackson                      www.bluequartz.net
>> > > Principal Software Engineer       [email protected]
>> > > BlueQuartz Software               Dayton, Ohio
>> > >
>> > > On May 23, 2011, at 4:32 PM, David Partyka wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I've never seen anything like that, as that is the same process I
>> > > > used to make the 3.10.1 binaries. Though I did use cmake 2.8.4. Are you
>> > > > using a really new Qt or something along those lines?
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Michael Jackson
>> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > > I followed the directions on the wiki page to compile my own
>> > > > ParaView 3.10.1 because I have some custom plugins that I compile. The 
>> > > > .dmg
>> > > > image was created just fine but the contained "ParaView.app" when 
>> > > > launched
>> > > > only has a menu bar that has "New Application" menu. Nothing else. Yet 
>> > > > when
>> > > > I run it from the Build folder everything works just fine. Is there
>> > > > something in the cmake configuration of ParaView that I need to set 
>> > > > that
>> > > > tells CMake that I am going to making a redistributable package? The 
>> > > > same
>> > > > thing happens if I try a "make install" from the command line. This is 
>> > > > on OS
>> > > > X 10.6.8 with CMake 2.8.3 and the ParaView 3.10.1 sources from the web 
>> > > > site.
>> > > > ___________________________________________________________
>> > > > Mike Jackson                      www.bluequartz.net
>> > > > Principal Software Engineer       [email protected]
>> > > > BlueQuartz Software               Dayton, Ohio
>> > > >
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > Powered by www.kitware.com
>> > > >
>> > > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at
>> > > > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html
>> > > >
>> > > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at:
>> > > > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView
>> > > >
>> > > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
>> > > > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Powered by www.kitware.com

Visit other Kitware open-source projects at 
http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html

Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: 
http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView

Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe:
http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview

Reply via email to