Rick, Coincidentally, I am looking at the CTH parts class of filters right now. Can you share the data or the images with the holes?
Utkarsh On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY ARL (US) <[email protected]> wrote: > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > Caveats: NONE > > Alan - yeah, the dataset opens correctly with < 80 servers. It doesn't > matter how I distribute those 80 servers - I can do 16 processes on 5 > nodes, > 8 processes on 10 nodes and it works. If I play the same game with > 80 > nodes, I start seeing the holes. I *doubt* that it's a bad node, but I'll > do some deeper investigating just to verify. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott, W Alan [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 3:43 PM > To: Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY ARL (US); [email protected] > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [Paraview] extract CTH parts (UNCLASSIFIED) > > Bad node? > > Try running the problem on a few nodes. Next, try running the "big node" > problem. As you shift the nodes you are using, does the issue follow the > underlying iron, or the same bad blocks in the dataset? > > Dataset opens correctly with smaller number of nodes? > > Want me to try it here? 80 does seem really, really small/easy/trivial for > big data... > > Alan > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Angelini, Richard C (Rick) CIV USARMY ARL (US) > Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 1:38 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Paraview] extract CTH parts (UNCLASSIFIED) > > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > Caveats: NONE > > I'm having an issue with the extract CTH parts filter in ParaView 4.0.1. > The dataset consists of 1024 spcth files, regular structured mesh, 14 > blocks. The issue seems to be that once I exceed X number of server > processes (it seems to be about 80 servers), I start seeing holes in the > resulting geometry. The more I exceed the magic number of servers, the > more > holes I see in the resulting part. If I create a clip using the > volume_fraction scalar variable(s), the geometry of the clip is correct - > that is, the underlying data seems to be there. So, I'm thinking that the > data is being properly distributed and all of the data is accounted for, > but > that there's an issue with the "extract CTH parts" filter? Doesn't seem > likely, but stranger things have happened. > > Any ideas? > > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > Caveats: NONE > > > > > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > Caveats: NONE > > > > _______________________________________________ > Powered by www.kitware.com > > Visit other Kitware open-source projects at > http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html > > Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: > http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView > > Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: > http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview > >
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://www.paraview.org/mailman/listinfo/paraview
