I have a block of data that I am trying to AMR. Using the default settings of num levels 2 and refinement ratio 2, I get an AMR with 2 levels but with same dimensions. I was hoping for level 1 to be the same dimensions as my original dataset, and level 0 to be half that in each dimension. How would I go about doing that? I’ve tried with varying levels of max num blocks. I guess my general question would be how the resolution of the levels get determined, because the output is not what I (perhaps naively) expect.
Can someone point me to the flash.smooth dataset, so that I can compare results, and perhaps move forward from a working example? I looked for it in vtklargedata but it wasn’t there. Should I expect AMR vthb datasets to work in ParaViewWeb? I’m running ParaViewWeb 4.4 from a AWS EC2 AMI instance from here: http://kitware.github.io/paraviewweb/docs/guides/ami.html And it won’t load my vthb file, even though my supporting files and folders are there. Thanks for all the help!
_______________________________________________ Powered by www.kitware.com Visit other Kitware open-source projects at http://www.kitware.com/opensource/opensource.html Please keep messages on-topic and check the ParaView Wiki at: http://paraview.org/Wiki/ParaView Search the list archives at: http://markmail.org/search/?q=ParaView Follow this link to subscribe/unsubscribe: http://public.kitware.com/mailman/listinfo/paraview
