I've also found that annoying about macros. I'm going to see what can be done.
Vladimir 2010/1/26 szergling <[email protected]>: > Hi folks, > > I was wondering if there's an idiom for skipping the generation of a > form completely at the top-level. This is mildly related to the > implicit return feature currently being trialled. Here's an example: > suppose I'm trying to skip over this form: > > (in-package :something-something) > > by using > > (defpsmacro in-package (x) nil) > > An in-package form then compiles to "null;" > > This spurious output may result in errors (I'm using ps to convert > my Lisp code to Actionscript). > > How about using (values) to indicate explicitly that something > doesn't have any return values? > > Yong. > > _______________________________________________ > parenscript-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel > _______________________________________________ parenscript-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
