On 1/27/10, Vladimir Sedach <[email protected]> wrote: > I've also found that annoying about macros. I'm going to see what can be > done. > > Vladimir
Thank you. Look forward to it. By the way, I think implicit return is a very useful feature. Yong. > 2010/1/26 szergling <[email protected]>: >> Hi folks, >> >> I was wondering if there's an idiom for skipping the generation of a >> form completely at the top-level. This is mildly related to the >> implicit return feature currently being trialled. Here's an example: >> suppose I'm trying to skip over this form: >> >> (in-package :something-something) >> >> by using >> >> (defpsmacro in-package (x) nil) >> >> An in-package form then compiles to "null;" >> >> This spurious output may result in errors (I'm using ps to convert >> my Lisp code to Actionscript). >> >> How about using (values) to indicate explicitly that something >> doesn't have any return values? >> >> Yong. >> <<snip>> _______________________________________________ parenscript-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
