Sounds interesting. Just a quick note: if I recall correctly, the "with" statement is notorious for being slow in JS implementations. Something to watch out for.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Vladimir Sedach <[email protected]> wrote: > > I nominate backquote/comma. At least at a 50,000 foot level, it seems > like > > the sort of thing PS could do, and it's pretty obvious that it would be > > useful. > > That's a really cool idea. > > The only two new features I have on the todo list right now are: > > 1. Use the 'with' statement to introduce proper scoping for closures. > 2. Generalize the implicit return code transformation to work with > assignment and arguments passed to functions. > > These are both ideas borrowed from the scm2js compiler > ( > http://hop.inria.fr/usr/local/lib/hop/2.0.0/weblets/home/articles/scheme2js/article.html > ). > > There are tons of CL features and functions that can be implemented, > but my plan is to only add new features by request. My plan for the > next release is mainly to refactor the compiler, and split off the > print subsystem into the JS-toolkit project (which will also include a > JS parser). > > Vladimir > > > Daniel > > > > _______________________________________________ > > parenscript-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > parenscript-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel >
_______________________________________________ parenscript-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
