I think it's a good idea for a library. Maybe as an extensions to Red Daly's PSOS? In any case, that would be one more idea to steal from HOP (http://hop.inria.fr/), which I think was doing object sharing before, and in a better way, than GWT.
As far as freedom and democracy, if someone requests a feature and it seems like a good idea, I will implement it. Vladimir 2010/2/27 Axel Rauschmayer <[email protected]>: > >> There are tons of CL features and functions that can be implemented, >> but my plan is to only add new features by request. > > I still think that the ability to send an object back and forth between > client and server (while it always remembers what class it is an instance of) > should become a standard part of PS. This would allow PS to compete with GWT. > > If you want to find out if there is broad enough interest in requests such as > mine, you could also let people vote on future features. > > Greetings, > > Axel > > -- > [email protected] > http://www.pst.ifi.lmu.de/~rauschma/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > parenscript-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel > _______________________________________________ parenscript-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
