On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Vladimir Sedach <[email protected]> wrote: > (ps (new (Person age shoe-size))) outputs new Person(age, shoeSize) > > This brings up a good point about the syntax of 'new'. Maybe the above > is not a good way? > > In any case, I've written up a description of how 'new' works now in > the reference manual > (http://common-lisp.net/project/parenscript/reference.html).
Thanks for the information! The existing syntax is OK by me, the only bug was the lack of documentation, which is now fixed. I think changing the syntax would break a lot of code and give people trouble without good reason. One nitpick: with READTABLE-CASE set to :UPCASE the example in the manual should read '(new (-person age shoe-size))' - or am I missing something else? Thank you again, -- Miron Brezuleanu _______________________________________________ parenscript-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
