Yes, it really should, but I want to encourage people to change their readtables to invert.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Miron Brezuleanu <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Vladimir Sedach <[email protected]> wrote: >> (ps (new (Person age shoe-size))) outputs new Person(age, shoeSize) >> >> This brings up a good point about the syntax of 'new'. Maybe the above >> is not a good way? >> >> In any case, I've written up a description of how 'new' works now in >> the reference manual >> (http://common-lisp.net/project/parenscript/reference.html). > > Thanks for the information! The existing syntax is OK by me, the only > bug was the lack of documentation, which is now fixed. I think > changing the syntax would break a lot of code and give people trouble > without good reason. > > One nitpick: with READTABLE-CASE set to :UPCASE the example in the > manual should read '(new (-person age shoe-size))' - or am I missing > something else? > > Thank you again, > > -- > Miron Brezuleanu > > _______________________________________________ > parenscript-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel _______________________________________________ parenscript-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parenscript-devel
