On 09/03/07 18:00 -0800, Allison Randal wrote: > What are the plans for these "Active" languages: > > befunge > cardinal > ecmascript > > (and is befunge really active?)
i recently updated befunge to work with state-of-the-art parrot. however, it's not a language that is compilable [0], therefore it's not using the compiler tools. and it's complete for befunge 93, therefore not that much active. so i don't know what's the best thing to do with it. maybe move it to some pir example? jérôme [0] well, some people wrote a befunge compiler just to show it's possible, but with lots of wizardry iirc -- [email protected] _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
