On Tuesday 01 December 2009 at 10:06, Patrick R wrote: > While I agree it will be useful to make the compilation process > more efficient, my underlying point is that with the current GC > any modest-sized data structure that exists at runtime appears > to incur an unacceptable runtime cost (and this would include > data structures created in applications as well).
I don't believe it's the cost of those data structures created for NQP. I believe instead it's the cost of the data structures created for PCC. Those are short-lived, mostly-garbage headers that we currently can't reclaim without a full stop the world mark and sweep run. -- c _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
