Will Coleda wrote:
The answer to both of these questions is that ext/ should never be
considered when running codingstandards tests.
I have added ext/ to the list of directories exempted from inclusion in
the list returned by Parrot::Distribution::get_perl_language_files().
This method is used to determine the files examined by these test files:
t/perl/Parrot_Distribution.t
t/codingstd/trailing_space.t
t/codingstd/copyright.t
t/codingstd/cuddled_else.t
t/codingstd/svn_id.t
t/codingstd/perlcritic.t
This fix (r46705) does not guarantee exemption all files under ext/ from
all codingstd tests. I simply extended to 'perl' files an exemption
already present for 'pir' files. I don't know Parrot::Distribution --
or, more precisely, the places where Parrot::Distribution methods are
used -- well enough yet to implement that more general exemption in a
safe manner.
Thank you very much.
kid51
_______________________________________________
http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
