Hi, and sorry for replying out-of-thread. > I noticed that internal subroutine _find_type_ge() was completely > uncovered. This meant that not only was there nothing in the test file > invoking it -- there was nothing in the module invoking it either!
That's a result of commit https://github.com/parrot/parrot/commit/762dddd5 > Is there any reason why we should retain this subroutine? No. I just failed to remove the sub when replacing its single invocation with a call to _find_type_min_ge(). > If not, then I will remove it as part of looking at the module to see > if there is any other still-uncovered code we can write tests for. Thanks for picking up my slack - much appreciated. Gerhard R. _______________________________________________ http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
