On 6/1/12 3:02 PM, Gerhard R. wrote:
Is there any reason why we should retain this subroutine?
No. I just failed to remove the sub when replacing its single invocation
with a call to _find_type_min_ge().
If not, then I will remove it as part of looking at the module to see
if there is any other still-uncovered code we can write tests for.
Thanks for picking up my slack - much appreciated.
Thanks for your quick response. I have removed that sub in commit
db9fc1209ddbdaeb43ee559e06892c4e64517156
I may do some other touch-ups as time permits to boost test coverage.
Thank you very much.
Jim Keenan
_______________________________________________
http://lists.parrot.org/mailman/listinfo/parrot-dev
