While looking more closely at the t3000 tests I realized that on Fedora we haven't had a mkfs.hfs for a long time... So the t3000 test hasn't actually been running.
It still seems to pass (whew!) but I've just sent a patch to make it run with the available filesystems so that if there is no mkfs.hfs it will still run the vfat test if mkfs.vfat is installed in the environment. The other thing is this: Is anyone still shipping a mkfs.hfs? Is anyone not shipping mkfs.hfsplus? Should we switch to using mkfs.hfsplus and fsck.hfsplus (on Fedora fsck.hfs is a symlink to fsck.hfsplus)? Plain hfs is ancient at this point, and if I'm reading the comments in the hfs resize code it is supposed to work fine with hfs+ so I think it's probably time to switch. Thanks, Brian -- Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT) - weldr.io - lorax - parted - pykickstart
