David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anant Narayanan wrote:
>>> Instead of removing it we could make it optional. That would give us
>>> the best of both worlds ;-)
>>
>> Perfect :)
>>
>> David; I think making po4a optional instead of removing it looks like
>> the best way to go.
>
> OK, how about a ./configure option to enable documentation? That will
> cause po4a to be invoked (and also checked for).
Ack.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
_______________________________________________
parted-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
