Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm preparing a patch that makes the build warning free,
>> and found some unused functions in libparted/labels/fdasd.c.
>> Here they are:
>>
>>      (fdasd_partition_type):
>>      (fdasd_write_vtoc_labels):
>>      (fdasd_change_volser):
>>      (fdasd_check_volser):
>>      (fdasd_reread_partition_table):
>
> On this specific case I think that would be better to leave fdasd out
> of your patch. We have a fix on Debian package that needs to be ported
> (from 1.7 release) and then dasd could be cleaned up.

I'm easy.
But you say "fdasd", then "dasd".  I presume the latter should be "fdasd".

However, are you worried about the risk of a merge conflict?
Unless it's more than a strategic fix, they shouldn't be changing dead code

_______________________________________________
parted-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel

Reply via email to