"Matt Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Having to waste time with nearly every patch, adjusting to
>>> globally-inconsistent indentation like this is why I'll probably end up
>>> making things consistent, once (if ever) there are few enough outstanding
>>> patches.
>>
>> I guess we ought to revisit the proposal to indent whole code using a
>> tool. I fully agree that this is boring and stupid.
>>
>> unclutter looks like a nice tool for that.
>
> What about 'indent'
> I recall hearing about some beautification about a year ago regarding
> the use of indent?
What I think unclutter is better is that it does support C++ and could
be used to indent the partedpp binding too. But it's not hard written
on a stone so it would be nice to others to share the feelings about
it.
--
O T A V I O S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855
Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
you the whole house."
_______________________________________________
parted-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/parted-devel
